Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Adeyemi Adeogun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. As mentioned in some of the comments, a law school dean would typically be considered notable per the WP:PROF guideline. But without reliable sources to verify, there is no proof that WP:PROF even applies. RL0919 (talk) 05:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Adeyemi Adeogun[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A biography by the subject's son, sole source is the family member's own company website. Fails WP:NPOV, WP:RS. Guy (Help!) 15:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete (G11), intended solely as a vanity page. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 15:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The article is lacking in citation, but it sounds as if he would be notable as an law review editor and for his ILO work alone, if not for the sheer breadth of his achievements. However verifiability may end up being the issue. So if you want to keep this article, find some cites. --Bejnar (talk) 20:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unverifiable. Unfortunately, I was unable to find any sources for Anthony Adeyemi Adeogun's achievements. I did find a bibliographic record of a book that he'd published, but other than his son's firm's website, there doesn't seem to be any coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 03:38, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remains unsourced. I agree that dean of a law school is usually notable, but none of that is sourced. It is not verifiable. Having spent a considerable amount of time on this, I was unable to find anything except a few mentions of him as an author or participant in things like the ILO. --Bejnar (talk) 22:20, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

weak Keep The documentation is not a secure as I;d like, but apparently a sufficiently notable academic. Dean of a School of Law is usually notable. DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Verifiably a professor with quite a few peer reviewed articles, but I can't find any verifiable sources to show that he passes WP:PROF. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.