Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthonio Sanjairag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anthonio Sanjairag[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article basically fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Govvy (talk) 18:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Govvy (talk) 18:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:53, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Leaning keep~~ A short search did turn up more than a few Thai articles about him, including from Thai Rath [1] and Goal.com [2] and others [3][4][5]. Alvaldi (talk) 19:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's very little, kinda WP:TABLOID, WP:ROUTINE. Govvy (talk) 19:50, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to Delete. After thinking it over, the coverage is not enough for him to pass WP:GNG as it is mostly just centered around his signing in May 2021. Alvaldi (talk) 17:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think it's too early for an article of him. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 13:38, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG (coverage is not enough) and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 17:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:20, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
comment- I agree with Lerdsuwa, its too early and the article fails GNG so it should delete or move to draft.Iamfarzan (talk) 04:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, The article does not show notability. Alex-h (talk) 07:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.