Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ansom chek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bánh tét. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:37, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ansom_chek[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page should be deleted for many reasons. Firstly, ansom chek is simply the Cambodian word for a Vietnamese banh tet. There already exists a wikipedia page for banh tet, there shouldn't be a separate page for ansom chek. Secondly, the page is a total stub with no information, unlike the page for Banh tet which is larger. Thirdly, the information is inaccurate - it gives the false impression that ansom chek are a Cambodian food when it's just a Vietnamese banh tet. This page is an unnecessary duplicate. Apples&Manzanas (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 October 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:00, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:03, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:03, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Bánh tét. Title is useful as a redirect, and I don't see the harm in keeping the history. —C.Fred (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per C.Fred. Rockphed (talk) 12:57, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per C.Fred (talk) --SalmanZ (talk) 13:52, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per C.Fred Apples&Manzanas (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.