Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anon Pairot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar · · 05:14, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Anon Pairot[edit]
- Anon Pairot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article appears to be promotional. Subject lacks notability as per WP:CREATIVE. Sources fail to establish notability. Article author posted all of three edits and has since disappeared from Wikipedia. Additionally multiple improve tags were added in March 2013 with no apparent result. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:24, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep From Spiegel[1] and more [2], many of the news ones 404ed and I can't see archives for them, like the Bangkok Post which 404ed. Likely to meet GNG if some work is put in. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 03:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.