Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annina Roescheisen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Annina Roescheisen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a tiny bit of coverage out there for this artist. However that has to be balanced by the obvious use of the article as a work of promotion. There are also some outright lies, such as the claim that she was in the world's most prestigious art exhibition, the Venice Biennale. Sources do not show recognition by galleries, museums or the art press; overall the artist does not meet our GNG guideline. --- Possibly (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete an overly promotional article that in its effort to boost the subject borders of being a hoax.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG or NARTIST. The claims are PROMO and misleading: Bembo @ Venice is a vanity gallery; the legit museums ("MAMO/ Le Corbusier in Marseille, the Delacroix Museum in Paris, the Hermès Foundation in Paris, and the French Alliance Institute in New York") are for a work by Xavier Veilhan and Eliane Radigueshe for which Roescheisen was a performer, and which don't show up on her own CV[1]. It is definitely not a hoax, and it may be TOOSOON but right now, but it doesn't meet N at present.Theredproject (talk) 18:33, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, agreeing that the content is misleading and inflammatory in nature. The artist fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Chirota (talk) 21:00, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I truly love that artist, and it's defamatory what you write about her here. You should do better research. She has exhibited at the Venice Biennale at the Palazzo Bembo and Mora in 2015 with Daniel Buren and Yoko Ono. That's how I was introduced to her work, and I have been following her ever since. You should truly conduct better research. There are tons of art press outlets out there like artnet, whitewall, and Time Out magazine. She recently worked on projects with Leica and the singer Seal, as well as a project with Adidas runners. Delphine Vries (talk) 18:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.