Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Chong
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Annie Chong[edit]
- Annie Chong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It was deleted over at zh due to notability. Lack of references, was an extra in a few series, generally unknown. Dengero (talk) 00:45, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Converse) 01:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Converse) 01:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 01:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 08:15, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:12, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It appears there are many Annie Chong's. I looked around a bit and could not find any sources I could directly verify. As such I must rely on the article itself which lists no independent and reliable sources as required by WP:BLP. I would error towards delete unless reliable sources come forward. Mkdwtalk 08:16, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I, too, failed to find any sources that might prove notability. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 16:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.