Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Arnold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 18:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Arnold[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this person is notable, and this article is so spammy. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMO. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't quite get her to notability. She did get some notice for her sculptures, but I couldn't find much beyond what was in the article. I thought surely I would find an obituary somewhere, since she died only last year, but I found nothing; that in itself speaks to her notability (or lack of it). --MelanieN (talk) 03:29, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (Changed from Comment) - work was mentioned/reviewed in The New York Times, may pass WP:ARTIST #4 d. Needs checking whether there are really pieces in the museums stated in the article, and whether they are "notable galleries or museums" under this guideline. There's no "National Academy" in New York to which she could have been elected, she was not a member of the American Academy of Arts and Letters (based in New York City). Kraxler (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The sources stated below, and the info available there, make clear that she passes WP:GNG and several other additional guidelines like ARTIST 4 d. The biographical entry cleared up that she was an associate of the National Academy of Design (which indeed seems to be simply referred to as the "National Academy") an institution founded in 1825, and where "one cannot apply for membership", one is chosen "from the highest ranks of American artists and architects". Kraxler (talk) 15:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She's in the Met (ref added), and Albright-Knox[1][2] though not quite sure how major the latter is. But I think there's sufficient coverage:

Article in New York Times already cited.
Hilton Kramer, "Anne Arnold's Peaceable Kingdom", 1971, reprinted in The Age of the Avant-Garde, Transaction, 2011.[3]
Campbell, Lawrence, "The Animal Kingdom of Anne Arnold", Art News 63:8 (Dec 1964) 32-33, 64-65
Campbell, Lawrence, "Anne Arnold at Fischbach", Art in America (Nov 1988) 173-174
Jules Heller, Nancy G. Heller, North American Women Artists of the Twentieth Century: A Biographical Dictionary, Routledge, 2013, p32[4]
A catalog Anne Arnold: A Retrospective published by the University of New Hampshire, 1983
Some things in Google Books snippet views including an article "Anne Arnold" in Craft Horizons, Volume 31, 1971.Colapeninsula (talk) 15:04, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep with the fixes. The Natl. Acad. Design might also clue us in on why she's not in a lot of shows past the 1960's: she may have switched from painting to design, which doesn't hang on walls as often. Hithladaeus (talk) 17:53, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In the collection of three notable museums (including the Met) is enough for WP:ARTIST, and the additional evidence provided by Colapeninsula is also convincing. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:51, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A woman born in 1925 has sculpture in the Met? This is something of interest.Soilmicro (talk) 01:55, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.