Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annadurai (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Annadurai (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG, no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:38, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Other than get into the Times of India, the movie did not get a significant amount of major press. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knox490 (talk • contribs) 05:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete. All the references made are related to the article and there is good notability of this article in those news coverage. Thanks. Passion1000 (talk) 23:48, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Passion1000: None of the newly cited souces are reliable and as I mentioned above there is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources so can you please explain how it passes GNG? Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 06:33, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the film never began filming - and it now seems to be stalled as a result of Radaan Mediaworks's [http://www.sify.com/movies/vijay-antony-s-annadurai-on-hold-to-shoot-for-kaali-in-may-news-tamil-respBQcgdafhd.html financial problems. Editor 2050 (talk) 18:38, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.