Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Slotky
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was : No consensus, even the keeps seem uncertain. Default to keep for now.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chairboy (talk • contribs)
Anna Slotky[edit]
How does this pass WP:NOTE, especially with the lack of credible sources. Avi (talk) 19:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. imbd is a legit source. Wikipedia:Notability (films)#Resources. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment For films, perhaps, but not necessarily actors. See Wikipedia:Notability (people) Note #5 -- Avi (talk) 19:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability unestablished. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:Notability. --SimpleParadox 19:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Google shows 2890 article's with the name "Anna Slotly", most or all relating to TV shows and movies. Clearly, she is a notable movie and TV star. She appears in IMBD and had numerous web pages written about her. Bstone (talk) 20:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I think any actor with a few minor credits will churn up the same amount of ghits. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Her roles have hardly been minor in every case. On TV she has had main supporting roles or even lead roles. Bstone (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No way was she in a "lead role," and I think that it's a stretch to define any of her roles as "main supporting roles."
Additionly, she hasn't been acting for seven years. That might imply that her acting wasn't that great (i.e. unnotable).--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]- I assume you have expert credentials as a reviewer of movies and TV shows? Sans that, I am confused how you can offer expert opinion as to the notability of her action based on absence. She went to college and is soon to graduate from law school. She, gasp, didn't become a huge movie star. But she did have a notable movie and TV career. Bstone (talk) 20:41, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Your right about my "additional" comment.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I assume you have expert credentials as a reviewer of movies and TV shows? Sans that, I am confused how you can offer expert opinion as to the notability of her action based on absence. She went to college and is soon to graduate from law school. She, gasp, didn't become a huge movie star. But she did have a notable movie and TV career. Bstone (talk) 20:41, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No way was she in a "lead role," and I think that it's a stretch to define any of her roles as "main supporting roles."
- Comment. Her roles have hardly been minor in every case. On TV she has had main supporting roles or even lead roles. Bstone (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I think any actor with a few minor credits will churn up the same amount of ghits. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see any reliable secondary sources about Anna. Are there any newspaper articles about her? I'm on the fence on this one. She does have some minor notability, but I'd realy rather see some secondary sources to build an article from. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 22:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. But I too am on the fence about this. The IMDB information is more directory information, accurate, but does not establish noteability. She has had significant credits but I can't find any discussion, commentary, or reviews from some reliable source "noting" her, thus the limited notability. It doesn't need to be web accessible. Just citeable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NrDg (talk • contribs) 05:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.120.179.204 (talk) 21:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Although it appears that she hasn't had any recent roles, her IMDB Pro score is well below 20,000, which makes her highly notable in the entertainment industry. But, the article needs to be expanded and cite references. TGreenburgPR (talk) 05:21, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per TGreenburgPR and others above. Seems notable enough. --Lockley (talk) 21:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep significant credits ≈Alessandro ♫ T • C 22:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.