Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Camner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Camner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG JMHamo (talk) 01:34, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Three of her exhibitions have been reviewed in Svenska Dagbladet, one of the two major daily newspapers in Sweden. There is also a relatively long article in the same newspaper about young Swedish artists including Camner. All these are listed in the article; there are no footnotes yet, but that is easily fixable. In addition there are reviews in two art magazines, and also a piece about her in the tabloid Expressen, which admittedly does not make for a notability claim on its own, however, given the articles in Svenska Dagbladet, I believe WP:GNG is met. --bonadea contributions talk 08:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Footnotes, and some text about notable solo exhibitions, added. --bonadea contributions talk 15:09, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per Bonadeas reasonings. and added footnotes.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Bonadeas. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.