Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Bastek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 16:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Bastek[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with just 228 unique Google hits. The Director of the Year Award she got is itself not an important award. And appearing in listings is also not an award. The Banner talk 16:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable businessperson spam / resume. head of a soft-tech business with just 30 workers --there are local car dealerships with a bigger staff so not apparently notable as a CEO or whatver. i suspect COI and i see that the original writer blanked a previous AfD of this. Cramyourspam (talk) 16:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'The Banner' The number of staff in a company is nto a reflection of its success. Wolfestone, Anna Bastek's company, was the 6th fastest growing company in Wales. This is not voted, or a nomination, this is fact. To be the 6th fastest growing company in a country, I think you'll agree, is quite an achievement. Anna Bastek is very well known within Wales, you may not be aware of her influence, but she is a very influential person in Wales and for the Welsh economy. She is a 'Dynamo role model' for the Welsh government'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.200.88 (talk) 10:10, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Please get your facts right, mr. IP/Crs1991. It was not my remark about the size of the company. And no, we are just building an encyclopaedia based on reliable, third party sources. Especially when writing about living persons, everything must be sourced. And a person can not inherit notability from an other entity, like her company (what may be growing big, but still has a doubtful notability-claim itself.
- I know that these deletion nominations are hard to deal with, especially when you are a company intern told to write wikipedia articles to promote the company. (I don't know if you are, but the article style and editor behaviour are similar of what I have seen with other marketing-interns.) If you are, please tell you boss that Wikipedia is not an advertising venue. The Banner talk 11:52, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete I could come down on the side of "weak keep" on this one, but looking at the sources for Anna Bastek (as opposed to the sources talking about her company - different article, notability is not inherited, and that article is in AfD as well), they are not really sufficient, with three inclusions in lists, which are trivial mentions (and should not be categorised as "awards" in the article). The only real claim to notability is the Director of the Year award which is apparently not a major one. Another point: the article creator did not blank an AfD as claimed above, they removed a PROD tag, which is allowed. --bonadea contributions talk 12:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.