Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Pouder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Coredesat 06:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ann Pouder[edit]
Stub article on a very old person, no substantive coverage referenced, and I haven't found any (thiugh I don't gurantee that my searches are definitive). She is listed in Oldest people, which is quite sufficient unless anyone finds substantial coverage in reliable sources to establish notability per WP:BIO. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She's the "Sarah Knauss" of 1917, or the 2nd oldest female ever at her time. Neal (talk) 07:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Her longevity is recorded in Oldest people. Where are the references which would establish the notability required for a standalone biography? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Boy, I would have to be a search engine to know that. As for off-line, I imagine it would be in the National Geographic magazine, June 1919 edition, which I don't have. Neal (talk) 08:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Keep because you guess that a particular magazine might have covered her? If at some future date, someone finds some substantive coverage in such a source, then a new article can be created, but notability isn't established by guesswork. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Boy, I would have to be a search engine to know that. As for off-line, I imagine it would be in the National Geographic magazine, June 1919 edition, which I don't have. Neal (talk) 08:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Her longevity is recorded in Oldest people. Where are the references which would establish the notability required for a standalone biography? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No significant coverage found. Epbr123 (talk) 15:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Just getting extremely old does not satisfy WP:BIO. The references, which are mere directory listings, are not the substantial coverage required to show notability per WP:N. Inclusion in a list is sufficient. One would have to dig out the claimed National Geographic article listing her to see if it is more than a directory listing or passing mention, but it would still be just one source. Edison (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.