Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Pennington (model)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 04:45, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Pennington (model)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is an uncited stub after existing for four years? Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG,nothing in the text that shows any Wikipedia:Notability (people) Off2riorob (talk) 20:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - poorly cited, not uncited. If it can be better sourced (although this model/actress was active in 1976), then a strong keep. Bearian (talk) 00:42, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is totally uncited, there is a link to a playboy primary. Off2riorob (talk) 00:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Keep, being a Playmate is notable, whether WP:PORNBIO mentions it specifically or not. Also, multiple mainstream appearances: "a regular on Card Sharks, but she also appeared as a substitute in 1976 on the Dennis James-hosted version of The Nighttime Price Is Right". Dekkappai (talk) 06:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable for being on the cover of Playboy, and for being a regular on a notable television show. Dream Focus 07:35, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She seems in the news a lot. [1] Dream Focus 07:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Definite WP:HOTTIE plus she meets or exceeds WP:PORNSTAR with her movie appearances and TV gigs. --Morenooso (talk) 08:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:PORNBIO per mainstream appearances. Epbr123 (talk) 11:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gillian Bonner and elsewhere--Milowent (talk) 22:16, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source or Delete Unsourced biographies of living persons that alledge they work in porn are unaceptable. Source or speedy. Hipocrite (talk) 15:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appears to satisfy WP:ENT. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.