Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankit Singh Jadon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 09:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ankit Singh Jadon[edit]

Ankit Singh Jadon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find anything about him outside of LinkedIn, Facebook etc. I imagine cricket umpires need to meet WP:GNG or WP:NCRIC and this person doesn't according to searches. Not a single sports news mention let alone anything in-depth. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Non-notable sport bio. Unreferenced BLP, only CCS is umpiring in the IPL but that's probably possibly, just enough to mean it would not qualify as 'speedy' (A7). Eagleash (talk) 11:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete No indication of notability, fails WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 12:18, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It's doesn't meet WP:GNG. Unreferenced BLP. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 13:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete — no in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 17:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Non-notable individual who fails CRINs inclusion guidelines for match officials. Besides, I think this is a hoax as CricketArchive has no record of a scorer by this name. StickyWicket (talk) 22:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom and others comments. Non notable cricket scorer. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable sportsperson. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:GNG. Scorers are not inherently notable (even if they score in notable competitions), and no evidence they meet GNG or even actually scored those matches. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Obvious delete - I suspect this is autobiographical. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO --Assyrtiko (talk) 21:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non notable and fails WP:GNG Nitesh003 (talk) 05:08, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Non notable player. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:20, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, fails all criteria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBirdsShedTears (talkcontribs) 09:21, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.