Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjali Ameer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:25, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anjali Ameer[edit]

Anjali Ameer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject in this article meets WP:SINGLEEVENT and it also passes WP:TOOSOON as the event is yet to occur (i.e. movie for which the subject is being considered significant is yet to be released) TopCipher (talk) 17:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete acting notability requires multiple significant roles, one role is not enough.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - is being the first transgender actor to take a lead role in an Indian film not a valid case for notability? Spiderone 09:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:52, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Fails to meet notablity requirements Knox490 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 19:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.