Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anja Konstantinova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anja Konstantinova[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As one could see this notability tag has been here for a while. I don’t think she meets notability for a model’s article (and yes, I did a Before) or an article at all, at this time. Sources given certainly aren’t reliable and I haven’t seen significant coverage. Trillfendi (talk) 05:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep While not much in-depth, there is some, there does appear to be a reasonable amount of sustained non trivial mentions and the subject does apparently get more than their fair share of editorial fashion coverage. There are references which would probably allow more to be added to the current article. Aoziwe (talk) 12:43, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on account of subject failing WP:NMODEL. Although we're advised sources are a-plenty, not much comes up. -The Gnome (talk) 14:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's too soon for her to have a stand alone article here. --Mhhossein ^talk 17:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.