Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Rinaldi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:41, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Rinaldi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Porn performer. Fails GNG and ENT. Wouldn't have passed PORNBIO either. Would also support a redirect to the relevant penthouse pet list. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:09, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:09, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:09, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:09, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article fails the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:47, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article because violated WP:PORNBIO.Forest90 (talk) 23:45, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: She's also a prominent European porn director falling under WP:CREATIVE but it's hard to review the extent of her coverage due to the preview limitations in Google Books and Scholar. For example, L'Espresso [1], Der Spiegel [2], Tallozo (a Hungarian magazine)[3],la Repubblica [4]. She is also covered in scholarly journals [5] [6] Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:52, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - After reviewing the sources, I believe she is notable under WP:BASIC. She is also described by the Associated Press [7] and Variety [8] as one of the European industry's biggest star which id evidence of criteria 3 of WP:ENT and her director awards are evidence of WP:CREATIVE criteria 4. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:34, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Syndicater (talk) 22:09, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Penthouse Pets. MT makes a plausible case for the subject's notability, but the flimsy content and weak sourcing, without a real assertion of notability, isn't enough to justify a BLP in the current form. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 00:22, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.