Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Renfroe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per improvements (sources) to the article. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Renfroe[edit]

Non-notable internet phenomenon, minimal secondary sources, fails WP:BIO and WP:BLP1E. Relata refero (talk) 13:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, apparently's been hired by GMA as a "special contributor". May put her over the margin for notability. The one youtube videos and a few concerts didn't do it for me, but this might. More sources being searched for. Relata refero (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - zero coverage from anything that passes as an independent reliable source. Posting a popular video on YouTube does not automatically make you notable. Terraxos (talk) 19:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Google news for the past month alone gives dedicated coverage in ABC News, The Independent, The New York Times, and Publishers Weekly. Youtube also has coverage from CBS here. What more can you want? -Paularblaster (talk) 18:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
comment sources have now been added to the article to the extent that they were not present already (in the unhelpful form of unidentified http links). --Paularblaster (talk) 18:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I'm inclined to think that GMA and the added sources do put her over the margin, though not by much. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.