Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Fuentes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per SK4 - Although not banned they are blocked ... Whatever closed . (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did revert the close & tag per G5 but I then realized I'd need to remove it from the log & other places ... It's too much fucking about so have reverted - If it's renominated then the 2nd nom should probably be treated as the first!. –Davey2010^Talk 00:22, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Fuentes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet the WP:GNG and lacks sources. Many of the sources are her official website and from YouTube. IntelligenceAgent (talk) 22:32, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 02:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 02:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 02:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE Recommend deleting this AfD nomination per WP:DENY as nominator is now indef blocked as a sockpupper of User:CookieMonster755. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 21:02, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.