Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal Tales (British postage stamps)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 00:39, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Animal Tales (British postage stamps)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This stamp issue is not notable in itself. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No claim to notability made here, just the issuing information don't make this useful or encyclopaedic. Also we are not a stamp catalogue with all those details. The foundation has the wikibooks:World Stamp Catalogue where such details would be far more appropriate. Individual stamp article must have some reliably sourced notability and I don't see any. ww2censor (talk) 14:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable; I don't think this article is able to meet Wikipedia's notable guidelines. It fails. Ashbeckjonathan 01:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Delete - there is some coverage at time of issue but no significant coverage beyond that time. -- Whpq (talk) 18:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - ditto Bluehotel (talk) 18:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A type of stamp with no significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 23:42, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.