Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anil Pandey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anil Pandey[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable politician. Hasn't won any relevant election. Content is half English and half Hindi. Palmsandbeaches (talk) 07:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - this was previously created as Anil Kumar Pandey and deleted after a discussion [1]

Palmsandbeaches (talk) 07:07, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The content is gibberish, because of likely vandalism by a now-blocked IP editor; the last good edit is perfectly legible. Notability would still need to be established, though. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN, person is not a representative in a state or national legislative body, only elected to a cooperative bank. All sources in the article are only mentions of the name, no actual descriptions of the person or details of their actions or influence, ie no WP:SIGCOV. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 23:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails our notability guidelines for politicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article neither sources nor even claims that he's ever held any role that would pass WP:NPOL, and the sources are not about him in the sense that would be necessary to claim that he passed WP:GNG in lieu. We're looking for coverage that is substantively about him, not just hits that happen to mention his name in the process of being about other things. I've also restored the last good pre-vandal edit. Bearcat (talk) 07:54, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.