Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angels boot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 00:04, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Angels boot[edit]

Was prod'ed and then {prod-2}, but some new user removed it with no reason cited. I see no reason to keep it. Un-sourced dict-def that gives more doubts than anything.

Delete Renata 03:01, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as much as I think {{prod}} is a good idea, it has no mechanism to deal with contested deletions, especially when at least one person is willing to act in bad faith. Savidan 03:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- So far every answer I have read said - go to AfD and debate and track any trolls, sockpupetts, etc. So that's why I have listed this and few others here. Renata 03:38, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This is the mechanism for dealing with contested deletions. But you might find this useful... Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 21:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Renata. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 03:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Renata StarTrek 06:03, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unverifiable. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 21:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn, unverifiable. Blnguyen 04:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.