Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelo Bertolini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Angelo Bertolini[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP:NACTOR C2 and C3 are out of the question. For C1, the article lists Wrong is Right, Homer and Eddie, and Lady in White. For all three films, their roles are not significant, so the subject does not satisfy C1. Doing a search, the relevant results are not reliable in the first few pages, so it is unlikely there are enough wp:reliable sources to provide enough coverage such that wp:basic is met. ~ Aseleste (t, c, l) 06:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per WP:NACTOR and GNG the article doesn't seem to pass. Also the source attached is pretty lousy and I didn't find any reliale sources about the person when doing a quick search (unlikely to change since the actor is deceased). - 𓋹 𝓩𝓲𝓪𝓭 𝓡𝓪𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭 𓋹 [user | talk] 15:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom, doesn't have indepth coverage, lacks WP:RS. Ambrosiawater (talk) 16:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I looked for coverage in Proquest and Newspapers.com and found only one mention coming anywhere close to significance. That's not enough. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 22:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:ENT. Peter303x (talk) 02:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As always, actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they existed — the notability test is not passed just by listing acting roles, it's passed by showing reliable source coverage about his acting roles to demonstrate their significance. But there are no reliable sources here at all. Bearcat (talk) 17:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NACTOR --Devoke water 10:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.