Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelikes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7 by RHaworth (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Angelikes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated for Speedy Deletion under A7 - author continually removes Speedy Deletion tags Exemplo347 (talk) 22:27, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is obviously made up by the creator. No coverage at all. WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL applies. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ducky behaviour going on. I have warned both editors who are coordinating to remove the speedy templates. Diff1 and Diff2. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under criteria A1, A3, and A11. The article does not provide sufficient context to the reader at all, is just an attempt to correspond with the title (in violation of the minimal stub length), and clearly indicates the subject was made up, with no sources whatsoever. Heat Is Cool 18:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Feel free to delete. This is not a made up article, this article is factually correct in the sense that everything that has been said in it is true. I know this as I am one of the producers for this show, hence why I created the page. Every time I tried to add something information appeared to have been changed before I'd even had the chance to correct or do anything about it. Let alone read it.

The show is already in production, promo shots complete, but no press release as of yet. I appreciate the page may have been created a little early but I didn't think it would cause this much of a problem. So feel free to delete the page as soon and as swiftly as possible.
Oh and by the way if anyone other user has been working on the page at the same time as I have that is nothing to do with me and you should approach the relevant user directly although there may not be much point anymore.

Thanks for your understanding.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thealikez (talk • contribs)

Moved from top --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.