Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelica Sin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 20:46, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Angelica Sin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:ENT, and the GNG; no relevant, nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits despite the scattered laundry lists of porn performers. No reliable sourcing says that the porn performer and the very minor wrestler are the same person; the porn performer is described as 5'7", green eyes, brunette, while the wrestler is described as 5'10", brown eyes, black hair. In any event, the combined coverage for however many performers use this almost-generic name is insufficient to meet the GNG or any relevant SNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 19:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Nom is the last editor doing significant work in PR0N, as such his views can be accepted without need for debate. Dekkappai (talk) 18:03, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing of consequence found on AVN or Xbiz. Doesn't meet WP:PORNBIO or GNG. I strenuously object to rewarding Nom with freedom from debate however.Horrorshowj (talk) 08:09, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears to lack independent coverage. Qrsdogg (talk) 17:17, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.