Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelica Michibata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Angelica Michibata[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delere: as non-notable entertainer. Quis separabit? 03:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I am not that familiar with Japanese models, but Michibata is quite famous outside the modeling business, appearing quite a lot on TV and in the entertainment press. The current article has many citations already, but I am not sure how good Model Press is as a source. So here are some citations from clearly reliable sources, mainly the mainstream entertainment press: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], etc. She thus has quite a lot of press exposure. I am not sure on what grounds the nominator asserts that she is not notable, but clearly she passes WP:GNG. Michitaro (talk) 04:10, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - She exists mostly somewhere between Japanese fashion magazines and tabloid press along with her two sisters, but she passes WP:ENT in Japan. Jun Kayama 05:18, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, plenty of info in Japanese sources. Jacona (talk) 14:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep likely if all this coverage is considerable and acceptable and I would've even closed this as such but, as Japanese subjects are not my closely known areas, I'll have it open for any available comments. SwisterTwister talk 07:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.