Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelica Barcelo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Angelica Barcelo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is unverified and is little more than a resume. A quick Google search reveals nothing--really, nothing at all. This cannot stand as a BLP. Drmies (talk) 00:41, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Per rationale per Drmies, subject of article does indeed lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources thus fails our general notability criteria.

Celestina007 (talk) 01:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — At least until acting credits can be established. Perhaps there's a Brazilian source we're not familiar with? --HistoricalAccountings (talk) 16:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about her. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we need to proactively prove notability, we do not leave around fluff articles because notability has not been disproved. There is no evidence Barcelo has ever appeared in any notable production, let alone had a significant role in one.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.