Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Pulvirenti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Angela Pulvirenti[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable with significant coverage in independent sources. Boneymau (talk) 06:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 06:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 06:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 22:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think she's most notable for presenting something several years ago, but i can't find much else. Fatty wawa (talk) 04:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Largely routine coverage that doesn't meet notability requirements for bios. As written, the article reads much like WP:NOTPROMO with a lot of padding. -- Whats new?^(talk) 09:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.