Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Barlow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Angela Barlow[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

7 year old basically unsourced WP:BLP for an actress who seems to lack the necessary notability to have her own article. According to Google, she mainly plays smallish roles in single episodes of TV series, nothing major or lasting. Her plays seem also to have received only minimal attention [1]. The middle two sentences of the article at the moment (about "snarf" and "mashive") seem to be 5-year old[2] vandalism.... Fram (talk) 15:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A lack of substantial coverage of her or her work. Her roles on TV have generally been small or medium-sized, rather than leading or well-known. She seems quite popular in Jane Austen circles, and crops up a lot in their newsletters and websites, but not in reliable sources. Lack of reviews of her stage work (although shows at e.g. Edinburgh Festival Fringe can attract a lot of reviews). It's possible her older, pre-internet-era work might make her notable despite appearances to the contrary, but at the moment I'm not seeing anything. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:21, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom and Colapeninsula. Checked 10 SERP pages on "web" mode, didn't find anything to establish notability, nothing in "news" mode for google.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:35, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.