Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Comedy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Angel Comedy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A comedy night in a local club is not notable, and any publicty it gets is lust that-- just PR. Apparently it has bigger plans for the future. So do many acts--when it accomplishes them, they there perhaps can be an article. Not yet notable DGG ( talk ) 06:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 07:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Londonist.com mentions a Chortle Award for the venue (Best small club, London), but only one of the sources (Beyond The Joke - a blog by Bruce Dessau) has the club as the main subject of its coverage, apart from that it seems to descriptions provided by Ferns and not independently of the subject or brief mentions but put together may be just enough for an article if the subject is significant enough. An alternative to deletion would be to redirect to the Barry Ferns article. Peter James (talk) 18:27, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 16:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.