Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aneuch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aneuch[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This wiki software seems to lack any notability. Yaron K. (talk) 17:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time I have had to defend the article, and I suppose if an article on Oddmuse didn't survive, I shouldn't expect mine to either. Apparently I misunderstood Wikipedia and its purpose. Do with it what you will. Cajunman4life (talk) 18:07, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish that the subject meets Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines. I've also marked a portion of the article as a copyright violation as it is copied verbatim from the project's page which makes no indication that the page is licensed in a way compatible with Wikipedia's. -- Whpq (talk) 13:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have included a public domain notification at the bottom of the original wiki, however since the article will be deleted it's a moot point.Cajunman4life (talk) 14:00, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's non-notable software. The coverage doesn't exist to show that it meets WP:GNG. Ducknish (talk) 21:11, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.