Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Levin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Levin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable figure, reads like an advertisement, and lacks citations. Detroiting (talk) 02:28, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:15, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article is so much an advertisement that it neglects to clearly mention Levin's 2006 defeat in running for the Michigan State Senate. The whole tone of the article is over advertorial. Levin does not meet the notability guidelines for politicians since he lost the election, and does not meet any other notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:51, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject not Notable enough. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Article gives off a promotional tone which has resulted in it becoming a biased article, most likely written by a person who has a personal relationship with the subject. —User4495 (talk) 21:21, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promo. google-news (after filtering by his company from 2011) - [1] shows 4 hits - none of which are really significant. google hits paltry as well (in the hundreds at most).Icewhiz (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.