Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Hopwood (Martial Artist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BigDom 18:53, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Andy Hopwood (Martial Artist)[edit]
- Andy Hopwood (Martial Artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete due to lack of notability established through significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Cind.amuse 07:52, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I see no reliable, non-trivial coverage of this topic. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 08:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I found nothing that shows he meets the notability criteria for either an author or a martial artist. The article also lacks independent sources. Astudent0 (talk) 17:17, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
KeepThe article has links to reputable martial arts publications which justify significance in that field. There are also reliable national UK publications cited. Pwjdawson (talk) 23:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]KeepTo substantiate the author's credibility, this topic has references to the author's published works as well as independant coverage in the UK media. Pwjdawson (talk) 23:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article includes reliable, third party and independent sources. Pwjdawson (talk) 23:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I found nothing that shows he meets any of the notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 01:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.