Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Wright

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. That was an easy decision to make. Tyrenius (talk) 02:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Wright[edit]

Another one from Sheridan College's "Notable" alumni list, though this one is possibly borderline for WP:BIO. Not sure if these awards are enough. BLACKKITE 16:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:BIO. GreenJoe 17:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, major exhibitions, subject of notable news coverage, meets WP:BIO. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable. The only concern is that the article needs to be Wikified more. NHRHS 2010 NHRHS2010 19:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He has been subject of sufficient critical attention and acclaim to meet WP:BIO. Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I suppose. It would be even better if we could obtain electronic copies of some of these off-line references.

(jarbarf) (talk) 03:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

quotes from them are included in the article, which is sufficient. DGG (talk) 05:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 03:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Satisfies WP:BIO. The article needs copyediting and formatting. freshacconcispeaktome 01:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.