Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Videto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:15, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Videto[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources for this article are a mix of dead links and trivia. There’s an external link to the subject’s twitter feed and he has 36 followers. I think this is a promotional article for a non notable subject. Mccapra (talk) 22:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Soft delete Not notable under WP:NOTABLE as brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability. Discussion about Google hits on articles talk page is irrelevant under WP:GHITS.Mrbuskin (talk) 13:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 23:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the Article, it's not notable and fails GNG, too.Forest90 (talk) 11:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.