Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Smale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Smale[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 06:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Another of the many hundreds of NN articles created by Dolovis in open and knowing defiance of consensus concerning applicable notability guidelines, and for which he received a community ban from new article creation. Fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence the subject -- a journeyman in the low minors and semi-pro leagues -- meets the GNG. Ravenswing 16:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The huge number of these articles on non-notable hockey players that have come to AfD make me began to wonder if we should create a policy that makes it so all articles need to be afirmiately accepted for creation before they are created.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NHOCKEY. Has some coverage (e.g., [1] but I don't see enough to meet GNG. Rlendog (talk) 21:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet WP:NHOCKEY.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.