Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Shulkind

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:57, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Shulkind[edit]

Andrew Shulkind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted through PROD as Heavily WP:REFBOMBed to the point to mask his utter lack of notability. His work on film is mostly minor things like "Libra Head Operator", whatever that is. Zero sourcing found that is specifically about him. This PROD was then contested by a SPA who may be the subject themselves based on their username, without addressing the claimed lack of notability. Article was created by a blocked spammer and approved at NPP by someone who later had their new page reviewer right revoked and was topic banned from AfD in part for ignorance of notability standards * Pppery * it has begun... 21:34, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:58, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I cannot find any substantial independent coverage. Does not seem to meet notability guidelines for creative professionals. Pawnkingthree (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No sources found, besides brief mentions or credit listings. The citations in the article are links to his website or movie credits. The various socks and blocked accounts as above also tell me this isn't notable. Oaktree b (talk) 23:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.