Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Pyle (philosopher)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:10, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Pyle (philosopher)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to be notable Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:12, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:31, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I find a GS h-index of 10, which is enough to pass WP:Prof#C1 in the low-cited field of philosophy. A more comprehensive nomination from the proposer of this AfD would have been appreciated. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:23, 13 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep as I was pensive hence why I had not commented sooner, but considering the encyclopedia position and the WorldCat, it's enough. SwisterTwister talk 08:03, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.