Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Luke (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:46, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Luke[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guidelines for authors, artists and the general guidelines. The only search results from Google and Google Books are self promotion or appear to be self-published. No verifiable independent reliable sources are available. The article was created in 2008 with a number of editors contributing, so there seems little prospect of this being addressed in the near future. The same BLP was deleted in 2007 but got resurrected. Fæ (talk) 22:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 22:14, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 22:15, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The reviews on a couple of independent web pages are better than nothing, but it's a long way off meeting WP:GNG and nowhere near meeting WP:CREATIVE. And the author of the article being "Drew Luke" doesn't help. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 08:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lacks the coverage that would establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.