Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Hidalgo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Hidalgo[edit]

This article is about the CEO of a NASDAQ-traded company, but that is basically all that the third-party reference sources provided say. I'm not convinced that simply being the CEO is sufficient to pass the requirements of WP:BIO, and the subject does not appear to be sufficiently notable in his own right to justify a biographical article like this. The previous AfD result in 2006 was "no consensus". DAJF (talk) 12:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although I consider being the CEO of a major company sufficient, not all NASDAQ companies can really be considered as major companies, even if they just manage to pass as notable for Wikipedia. With 500 employees total, this construction company does not seem to qualify as major enough to make the CEO a notable position. DGG (talk) 15:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notability provided or easily apparent. tedder (talk) 02:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 03:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.