Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew C. Wilson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew C. Wilson[edit]

Andrew C. Wilson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:USCJN - county court judge with no further indicia of notability. I found the original source, from which the original article content was closely paraphrased, and found no further information there to support general notability. bd2412 T 18:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom's point, non-notable county judge.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:44, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 08:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Traintalk 06:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Local judges not notable without meeting GNG, which this judge does not. agtx 21:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.