Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Bryant (Motivational Speaker)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:58, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Bryant (Motivational Speaker)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability. Hype-y bio sourced to almost no third-party sources; the podcast may be arguable third-party, but is not a reliable source. Google searches for "Andrew Bryant" and "Andrew Bryant" speaker (to weed out the many other people of same name) found no relevant reliable sources in first 100 hits. No relevant hits in Google News or News Archives for "Andrew Bryant" speaker. Google Books for "Andrew Bryant" speaker lead with a few books he's author or co-author on, and quickly degenerated into various hits which did not have his name mentioned. Nat Gertler (talk) 12:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete as self-sourced PROMO. To supplement searches by Nom, I searched "Andrew Bryant" + success and got to the same sort of primary sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:50, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I have been unable to find hardly any 3rd party reliable sourcing for this person. In addition, the page is promotionally written. Gluons12 ^☢|☕ 20:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete plain advertising The Banner talk 21:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OUTCOMES and WP:GNG. This guy appears to be just another cheerleading speaker. Yes, he spoke in Singapore, a tiny nation that I spent five days in and saw almost all there is to see (I loved the popiah, for what it's worth). I remind the gentle reader that we are a private American charity, not a free web host for jet-setting business people out to make a profit. Bearian (talk) 21:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. I endorsed NatGertler's original PROD. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.