Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Bradley (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:18, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Andrew Bradley[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Andrew Bradley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Vanity page, unremarkable person. UKWikiGuy (talk) 14:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO. Not sufficiently notable or important.--KorruskiTalk 14:26, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Not sure it is a vanity page. User:Warwicksu could just as easily be someone else in the student union wanting to publicise a former president. However, although he's done pretty well with media appearances for a student union president, that's not quite enough. If independent reliable sources started writing about his appearances, that might be different, but as it stands, close but no cigar. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO. Promotion of non-notable student leader. RayTalk 04:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.