Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andres Järving

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.I don't believe there's enough discussion here to find a consensus. As a note to LaMona, no, there is no prohibition on articles created only from non-English sources, but of course, it is certainly more difficult to check such articles. j⚛e decker ^talk 22:10, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andres Järving[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear and unestablished notability, sources could be (much) better for a BLP. The whole article is basically a list of companies and positions where Andres Järving has been involved. Reads like a PR-company created vanity piece. Sander Säde 12:35, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:14, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:14, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How can i improve aricle about Andres Järving? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maarja 123 (talk • contribs) 07:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 21:43, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article has been updated and appropriate sources has been added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tahvel (talk • contribs) 11:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (articulate) @ 19:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete The references are very weak, and do not establish notability. None that I can read (in English) are actual third-party references, and many simply list his name (directory-style). There may be significant resources about him in Estonian, but the ones here appear to be blog-like. If there are no English language significant resources, does it make sense to have an article in English wiki? I know that non-English resources are allowed, but is there any statement on articles with no English-language resources? LaMona (talk) 14:14, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.