Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas von Bülow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep Kotepho 04:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andreas von Bülow[edit]

questionable notability, nobody pseudosceintist, left wing activist passing herself off as an expert--IPO 01:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete does not meet nessesary standards of notability, article is being used to shove a fringe POV at the expense of informative research--IPO 01:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep, as he was the German Federal Ministry of Defence and Minister for Research and Technology. I have a strong feeling that IPO's recent nominations were all in bad faith, as the articles he nominated were all about critics of the 9/11 incidents [1].--TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - ditto to TBC. This person is noteworthy for sure! - Richardcavell 01:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep as bad faith WP:DISRUPT nom. Clearly notable author, German politician. Шизомби 02:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Difficult to see this as other than POV nomination Dlyons493 Talk 02:19, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Sorry Guy 03:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Bad faith nomination. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 03:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, person is notable, bad faith nom based solely on persons views and not on notablility.--Jersey Devil 04:01, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.