Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea S. Klouse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:48, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea S. Klouse[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The local awards are not enough, and there are some reviews in Google news archive about her Vivace! ensemble that may indicate that it is notable but that don't really provide any nontrivial coverage about her of the type provided by WP:GNG. I did find this story that appears to be about the same person but it clearly does not pass Articles for deletion. Ghostboy1997 (talk) 22:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She does not meet WP:ACADEMIC Kabirat (talk) 08:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral so far (see below) -- her works are published by Hal Leonard which is a major music publisher. I'm going to read more about the "Concert Series" series, but it may be enough to pass or at least hint that her awards are not puffery. This is all for the Artist criteria. Not enough for WP PROF. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 16:46, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 03:58, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- changed from neutral above -- wide distribution in performance recordings (especially Prayer of the Children) convinces me that at least three of her compositions are notable and thus by Notability (Music) so is she. Ensemble itself is not her most notable creation. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:32, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. A lack of evidence any of the songs are notable. Being played a few times and being distributed is not enough for WP:NSONGS. duffbeerforme (talk) 22:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:16, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The lack of references and reliable sources is majorly concerning. I'd reconsider if the article is updated, but as it stands no. Dusti^*poke* 00:29, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 03:29, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.