Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Nemeth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Nemeth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an actress with no strong or properly sourced claim of notability. As always, actors and actresses do not get an automatic free pass over WP:NACTOR just because roles are listed in the article -- if you're going for "notable because she's had roles", rather than "notable because she won or got nominated for a major acting award", then the notability clinch is not in the list of roles itself, but in the depth and quality of reliable sourcing that can be provided to get her over WP:GNG for the having of roles. But the only reference shown here is the self-published website of a non-notable minor film festival, and even that fails to verify any of this article's content at all: it contains no mention of the subject or any film or television role she ever had, but appears to just be a blank template page. There's no significant media coverage about her to get her past GNG, and nothing claimed in the text is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to get past GNG. Bearcat (talk) 19:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete too reliant on a non-notable source. One of thousands of articles we have on non-notable actresses.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:01, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:34, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:34, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 02:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nothing on news, nothing i can see on google, imdb showing her work but nothing out of the ordinary, refs in the article say nothing. Szzuk (talk) 08:55, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per GNG. She has several mentions in secon. sources, view her IMBD for more info. ACYBERWARRIOR 19:22, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

She was also in the movie 'Scary Movie' which is a very highley rated movie. I don't understand how she is not notable. ACYBERWARRIOR 19:23, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The notability clincher for an actress is not "has had roles", it is "has received enough reliable source coverage about her to pass WP:GNG for the having of roles" — and having her name mentioned in sources about other things is not the same thing as coverage about her. And IMDb is not a notability-supporting source that gets an actress into Wikipedia in and of itself, because everybody who has ever worked in film or television at all always has an IMDB page. Bearcat (talk) 16:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.