Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Martinez
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Closed as speedily deleted per WP:CSD G10-- negative unsourced BLP. Though the lack of WP:RS for an article such as this as it sits would qualify for speedy deletion, I also searched for WP:V via WP:RS on Google. Although there are Google hits for the subject's name, the particular details for this particular article could not be verified. There were hits for a non notable case involving a person with this name. The facts as reported do not concur with any version of this article. In light of the seriousness of events that are verifiable in another case, and the number of uninvolved people with this name, maintenance of human dignity, the potential for harm and disparagement problem require this be deleted, even assuming the the good faith of the creator. Dlohcierekim 00:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Andrea Martinez[edit]
- Andrea Martinez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Doesn't assert any real notability, no sources. Someone tried to afd it but didn't complete the process, and of course I'm the ONLY editor on the whole project who ever notices when a discussion is red linked. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - WP:HOAX, a search for
"Andrea Martinez" ice cream tucson murder
returns no meaningful information. I tagged it. §FreeRangeFrog 20:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Meh, no content before and no content now due to a courtesy blanking, let's just get this clear speedy out of here. Also, the only editor? Of course you are, buddy. treelo radda 00:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.