Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea England

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested; see WP:SOFTDELETE. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea England[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially toned WP:BLP of a musician, who has no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and no strong reliable source coverage to support it. The strongest things here are winning or being nominated for music awards that are not "major" enough to satisfy NMUSIC #8, and charting on a digital radio service's non-IFPI-certified single-network bad chart. And except for a single deadlink of one CD review in a magazine, the referencing here is entirely to primary sources, blogs and simple directories that cannot assist notability at all. As always, a musician is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because she exists; reliable source coverage must support a notability claim that satisfies NMUSIC for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 19:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:31, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.