Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrés Camilo Mosquera Hoyos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NYC Guru (talk) 02:16, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This AFD was closed early by a NAC somewhat out of process, but I am "reclosing" this as a WP:SNOW delete. The sole opposer to deletion failed to use any amount of policy to support their argument. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andrés Camilo Mosquera Hoyos[edit]

Andrés Camilo Mosquera Hoyos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find anything to satisfy WP:SPORTBASIC, noting that the guideline explicitly states that such articles must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. My searches yielded no such coverage. I tried multiple variations of his name but only got significant coverage about other players with a similar name, such as Andrés Mosquera Marmolejo. Best sources I could find were FCF and El Universal, both trivial mentions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:39, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.transfermarkt.nl/andres-mosquera/profil/spieler/665930 Hans Footballscout2023 (talk) 19:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DO NOT DELETE See Transfermarkt! Hans Footballscout2023 (talk) 19:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.Delete no GNG, no SIGCOV. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested transmissions °co-ords° 20:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. None can be found in the article and none is presented here. Transfermarkt.nl is an unreliable database source. Alvaldi (talk) 20:41, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 21:53, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete lacks SIGCOV and fails GNG. Tails Wx 13:55, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Article fails WP:GNG. Jogurney (talk) 14:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Totally random player. Was created as an afterthought by a buddy on his team after creating an article about himself. Fails the WP:GNG as there is no WP:SIGCOV. gidonb (talk) 00:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is no evidence that the subject is notable Almeida Fernando (talk) 09:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.